By Donna Motley, Vice President of Claims
Studies have indicated that the longer a person is off work due to a work related injury, the less likely they are to return to productive employment. Once (physical) restrictions are imposed by the treating physician, an employer has the decision to make whether or not they will let the injured worker return to work with those limitations. For the office worker that is given the restriction of “sit down work only” or the machine operator that is restricted to “no lifting over 50 pounds” and his regular job does not require any lifting or only lifting up to 10 pounds, the decision to return the employee to work is not that difficult. As indicated, a return to work policy is beneficial for the employee as they remain productive members of society, and the employer, as it does not impede work flow and will aid in limiting their Workers’ Compensation exposure. Bringing an employee back to work with restrictions also sends a message to all employees that being injured at work will not result in a paid vacation!






ANY injury to the head is serious. ANY injury to the head should be called in to us immediately. ANY injury to the head should be treated immediately. A visit to the occupational clinic is fine; if the clinic feels it is warranted, they will refer the injured worker to the emergency room where, most likely, a CT Scan may be performed. You want to avoid the employee indicating they are “fine”, then going home and deciding later that evening that they need medical treatment and they then go to the emergency room without authorization.





Surveys were given to each attendee. The comment on the meeting location – all checked “Excellent”. Hand written comments added “St. John’s is Awesome”, “Very Nice, and “Keep the same location”. Food also had unanimous “Excellent” grading.
Once a Workers’ Compensation claim is turned in to our office, we take the reins and take control, attempting to minimize all the costs involved, the length of disability, and to assure a successful return of the injured worker to productivity. Everyone benefits. But, as an employer, there are things that you can do to help mitigate the expenses or costs on the claim.

Through a review of the lacerations within MTMIC’s loss run history, the issue of laceration injuries is very apparent. Since 2009, 2,091, or 25% of the total 8,536 injury claims reported have been lacerations. Of those 2,091 laceration claims, 1,508, or 72%, were reported to have taken place on the hand (fingers, thumbs) of the injured employee.
By Ruth Kiefer, ARM Loss Control Manager


What makes these numbers more impressive than just the raw data, is that we grew (exposure base) in 2013 and 2014. Growth in 2013 was 13.12% larger than 2012 and our estimate of growth in 2014 vs 2013 is 5.88%. The offset to this great news of reducing claims frequency is that the claims that do happen are costing more. There continues to be an upward trend on medical care costs and time loss.